Please click here to view the PDF version


“And what would you do, if you could rule the world for a day? I suppose I would have no choice but to abolish reality.”

--Robert Musil

Commentary & Analysis


Janet & Company just couldn’t do the deed.

Given that Janet & Company sounded so “hawkish” when they were sipping wine and eating cheese in Jackson Hole, reporters at the recent Fed press conference asked if waiting till after the election to hike rates might be politically motivated. “Oh no”, she said.  “We never discuss politics.”  I take Janet at her word.  Why would the Reserve Board need to “talk” politics?  I think most of them are big government-loving leftists anyway. Has anyone else got the feeling the Fed’s credibility has lurched even deeper into the laughable zone thanks to the last press conference?  Dot-plot anyone…what the heck is that mess anyway… 

Dollar bull market or will the dollar disappear?

My son asked yesterday, with his tongue firmly planted in his cheek, if I was able to sleep at night knowing “world money” was about to replace the US dollar by the end of next week? 

Given the global macro backdrop and the potential for:

1)      A significant mark-down in Chinese growth prospects as both banking and real estate concerns loom.

2)      Real potential for a significant risk-driven fall in the euro as:

a.       Germany weakens politically (Mrs. Merkel disastrous refugee policy coming home to roost) and economically (big decline in German exports on falling global demand)

b.      An Italian referendum looming

3)      The US economic demand globally still weak despite some bright spots

4)      Emerging market debt in the ozone with hair trigger international investors ready to dump EM bonds on the first sign of trouble…

...all usually bullish for the reserve currency, I told my number one son: Yes, I am able to sleep just fine.  But even if am wrong on the direction of the dollar, I still suspect it will act as the global reserve currency well past the end of the month.  

If you are confused here, let me bring you up to speed on this: A major newsletter house currency charlatan guru is guaranteeing the dollar is doomed and will “in fact” be replaced by “world money” at the end of this month.  [I am not kidding.  Promos and videos galore are supporting this hallucination.]

But despite said charlatan’s  guru’s warning, I am sticking with my call for another leg up in the US dollar bull market before it is over.  But, with this caveat: If those overseas dollars are being gathered up by the secret “world money” administrators (I guess they go door-to-door to collect these things, but not sure) and start showing up packed in tractor trailer trucks at our ports, I will change my mind. 

George Orwell said: “Advertising is the rattling of a stick inside a swill bucket.”  In this case, I think he nailed it.

New Zealand Dollar: Finally?  Maybe?

I have been trying to short the New Zealand dollar off and on for a while now; with very little success, and mostly failure.  But just maybe something is clicking this time.  And if something interesting happens with risk assets (i.e. a big dump in the stock market) I think the New Zealand dollar can tumble. 

I shared these three rationales for reasons to go short Kiwi with our Black Swan Forex subscribers:

1)      NZD is tightly correlated with price action in emerging stock markets

2)     NZ$ vs. US$ relative yield spread has been falling

3)     Our Elliott Wave chart analysis

You can view the full report here…

Kiwi breaking a bit today…fingers crossed.

Forex Traders: Subscribe to Black Swan Capital forex service


ETF Macro Investors: Subscribe to Key Market Strategies

Hopefully, Black Swan represents the anti-guru approach to trading and investing.

Have a great weekend.

Thank you.

P.S. Jerry—I just tried 10-year Benromach for the first time (yesterday); really good stuff.  Ralfy’s 2014 whisky of the year

Jack Crooks

President, Black Swan Capital






Time for central bankers to find a spine…

Please click here to view the PDF version


“If you don't know where you are going, any road will get you there.”

 --Lewis Carroll

 Commentary & Analysis

Time for central bankers to find a spine… 

After the Bank of Japan (BOJ) did what it did, a boatload of economics Ph.D. descended on the airwaves and internet blogs this morning to share their usual inside baseball stuff in an effort to explain the “bold” move by the Bank of Japan—targeting the yield curve.  But outside the minds of economists who actually condone such tinkering will any of this matter? 

Japan has blazed the trail to zero rates and beyond.  Suckers in Europe have followed because it has worked so well for Japan.  This action on the part of the CBs begs the question: To what good have any of your policies done, short of providing liquidity to help stabilize the banking system and credit markets in the midst of the crisis?  The BOJ has been at this game of ZIRP off and on (mostly on) for the last 20+ years.  Growth in Japan is still morbid.  Debt to GDP is off the charts.  And deflation is still the order of the day.

Some seers are saying the BOJs decision not rely on increases in the money supply, and just maintain its current level of quantitative easing, is a hint to the Japanese government that monetary policy isn’t getting the job done and structural reforms are needed in order to change the economic trajectory. 

To review, Prime Minister Abe was elected in December 2012.  Upon taking office he enunciated a three arrow strategy in order to break the grip of deflation in Japan and grow the economy.  These three arrows were: 1. the pressuring of Bank of Japan into launching unprecedented aggressive monetary easing and setting a target of 2% inflation to support a target of 2% real GDP growth (4% nominal growth); 2. a blowout deficit-financed supplemental government budget filled with new public works spending; and 3. a program of reforms to achieve growth through stimulating private investment.  The third arrow, the most important if you aren’t a hedge fund manager, is the most important. And so far this arrow hasn’t left the quiver. 

Why?  Simple answer: Crony capitalism doesn’t want real reform (Brexit a perfect summary of that.) Big business doesn’t want real competition.  This is why CEOs of our major corporation are joined hand-in-glove with our political leaders. Big investors love the financial asset bubble; why make changes?

I am not sure if the BOJ is implicitly sending a message to the Japanese political class.  But I do know it is past time all central bankers reach back and find their spines, assuming they ever had such a thing to begin with, and explicitly tell their respective governments—we can do no more.  Financial repression isn’t working for most of our citizens; save those with access to capital.  Is there any wonder why hedge fund manager extraordinaire Ray Dalio, and his cronies, are constantly creating all kinds of arguments why the Fed shouldn’t raise rates—“OMG, they can’t raise rates.”  Hell, I think if Ludwig von Mises were pulling down a cool $500+ million a year, as did Dalio in 2015, he’d be all for financial repression too. 

Add to this shit-show the fact no one yet understands the potential unintended consequences of negative rates.  The prospect of an estimated $12 trillion in paper issued at negative rates is an anathema to a market system that allocates finite resources through proper price signals, and should terrify anyone with a logical brain cell left in their head. 

Time for real structural reform, or to put it another way, time for Mr. Market to start clearing away the dead wood so fresh entrepreneurial growth can resume is way past due.  That signal for the entrepreneur is sent first and foremost through the rate of interest (the signal now being sent to the market will be responsible, at some point, for the trillions of dollars in capital flowing straight down the rabbit hole).  But instead of CBs doing what we know works (does anyone remember a man named Paul Volcker), let’s just keep stumbling along in monetary and fiscal wonderland, keeping those political contributors happy, and expecting everything to work out for the best.  It’s such a grand idea it requires a Ph.D. in economics to understand it.   

Subscribe to Black Swan Capital forex service

Thank you.

Jack Crooks

President, Black Swan Capital






Dollar Reserve Currency Confusion – Or just snake oil salesmen…

Please click here to view PDF version

“Surely nobody would be a charlatan, who could afford to be sincere.”
--Ralph Waldo Emerson

Commentary & Analysis
Dollar Reserve Currency Confusion – Or just snake oil salesmen…

There seems to be a lot of confusion about the US dollar reserve currency status.  The biggest fallacy is the belief the US $’s reserve status bestows some great benefits on the US economy.  It doesn’t.  In fact it’s quite detrimental.  I am penning this piece now because I noticed the snake oil salesmen (aka pundits and gurus who like to scare people using the dollar as their boogeyman) are out in force yet again. 


In their never-ending series of dollar doom (DD) forecasts, predictions, confusions, hallucinations, lies, and manipulations (I will let you pick which of the words you wish to attach to your favorite double-D guru) I must say the latest incarnation they are peddling from the back of their wagon is a real whopper. 


The DD punditry is now providing not only a specific reason why (“world money” will replace the dollar), but an exact date (the end of this month) to their crystal-ball-ology. I am not making this up—really.  Of course the go to trade, once again, is gold.  $10,000 an ounce on the way…again!


I’d like to share a few reality bites in effort to help you understand why you need not fear the Charlatan Choo-Choo of DD which seems to be racing down the tracks of gullibility…


Rationale/Fallacy #1: The dollar will be confiscated by international authorities who will be issuing “world money” and sending dollars back to the US in shipping containers.  LOL…Now seriously, if I have to explain why this is total crap, you shouldn’t be wasting your time reading Currency Currents anyway. And don’t think this forecast is based on some miraculous issuance of International Monetary Fund Special Drawing Rights (SDR).  SDRs are a claim on currency (they are not currency); and there is only a miniscule amount available anyway relative to the needs of the global monetary system.  And guess what:  The US dollar is the largest weight of the currency basket on which said SDRs are based. [Could one-day the SDR play a bigger role in the global monetary system?  You bet.  Is that one-day anytime soon?  No way, as evidenced by the complete fecklessness of the G-20.  Would a bigger role for the SDR be bad for the US economy—nope…in fact it would be very good for the US economy, which leads us to fallacy #2…

Rationale/Fallacy #2: The US dollar world reserve currency status will be challenged.  This is one of the most consistent “go to” snake oil salesman rationales in the book.  Every DD worth his weight in yuan pulls this one out of their basket of confusion when needed.  But then again, most of the PhD’s in economics buy into this fallacy (no surprise there I guess). 

Let’s use the US-Chinese relationship as our standard for understanding the detrimental role of the reserve currency at it relates to excess foreign reserves invested in US Treasuries:

Remember these key contentions.  Foreign buying of US Treasuries…

  1. Doesn’t help out the fiscal deficit in the US, but in fact makes it worse.
  2. Doesn’t help push interest rates in the US down, but in fact pressures rates higher if anything.
  3. Doesn’t help US employment, but in fact hurts it.

Okay, here we go with the example, I will do this in bullet point format in order to help simplify because it is confusing (balance of payments accounting is supposed be so simple):

  • China has excess savings and it shows up in its current account surplus as such.  (Now we need to make a clear distinction between a country’s savings and individual savings—they are two different animals).  Excess savings is another way of saying production exceeds consumption; or domestic demand cannot handle all the production therefore China has to find it elsewhere.  Thus, China exports these savings in the form of purchasing US Treasuries, as said in order to grab demand from the US. 
  • So let’s look at the equation….
    • China buys US$’s; then buys US Treasuries with those dollars…
      • $ buying by China forces up the relative value of the US$ compared to the Chinese yuan.
        • An appreciating US$ (and falling Chinese yuan) tends to put downward pressure on US manufacturing, as the goods manufactured become relatively less competitive …
          • Pressure on manufacturing puts downward pressure on employment, i.e. it increases unemployment and it in turn creates a feedback loop of lower relative investment from manufacturers in the US.
  • Now, one of two things can happen:
    • Chinese investment in Treasuries can be borrowed by businesses for investment purposes and to a degree negates impact of a lower dollar on employment; i.e. business investment creates new jobs (a positive outcome).  But, as indicated above, this doesn’t usually happen because the rising US dollar makes manufacturing relatively less competitive and the feedback loop of lower employment reduces domestic demand.
    • Government increases the supply of bonds to mitigate impact falling tax receipts.  The US government attempts to mitigate the negative impact of China grabbing US demand, as described, through increased borrowing and spending to help alleviate impact of unemployment (falling tax receipts from workers and manufacturing sector); in short more government spending in order to replace lost local demand because of Chinese buying Treasury bonds.  This is usually the case.    
  • Now, it is precisely this additional borrowing by the US government which increases the supply of bonds which in turn pressures interest rates higher.  [Additional private borrowing to support the prior standard of living also creates problems of its own as this borrowing is primarily spent on consumption and/or real estate—neither of which produce a cash flow to retire the debt.]
  • To simplify, remember that a rising current account deficit means lower tax receipts to government.


 Net foreign buying of US bonds:

  1. Slows US growth
  2. Increases debt
  3. It does not lower interest rates
  4. Foreign buying increases fiscal deficits
  5. Adds to the current account deficit

So, where is the great privilege here?  Why do other countries get so worked up when someone starts buying their bonds, as they buy US bonds?  For example Japan makes sure it sterilizes any impact of China buying its bonds by turning around and buying a similar amount of US Treasuries to neutralize the impact.  If this reserve status was so great why would Japan not embrace China’s buying of its bonds?

A French finance minister, Valéry Giscard d'Estaing, coined the phrase “exorbitant privilege” to explain the role of the US dollar in the global monetary system (even though the French, and the rest of Europe for that matter, piggybacked on artificially low exchange rates relative to the dollar after the War and never revalued—talk about no good turn goes unpunished.)

But Mr. Giscard should have known better.  He would have had he read anything from economist Robert Triffin who expressed this warning about a US dollar replacing gold in the monetary system: 

In 1960, Triffin testified before the United States Congress and warned of serious flaws in the Bretton Woods system. His theory was based on observing the dollar glut, or the accumulation of the United States dollar outside the US. Under the Bretton Woods system, the US had pledged to convert dollars into gold, but by the early 1960s, the glut had caused more dollars to be available outside the US than gold was in its Treasury. As a result, the US had to run deficits on the current account of the balance of payments to supply the world with dollar reserves that kept liquidity for their increased wealth.

Despite the end of Bretton Woods, the dollar’s role is still hugely dominant as the reserve currency.  And guess what: the US runs a large and chronic current account deficit with the rest of world. 

So, if another country took on the burden of reserve currency status, or some incarnation of Keynes idea at the Bretton Woods conference—the bancor—is reincarnated, the US economy will be much better off.   

So, the next time Mr. Snakeoil tries to scare you with the usual “loss of reserve currency status” canard, tell them:  That’s great! I am investing in America.   

Subscribe to Black Swan Capital forex service

Thank you.

Jack Crooks

President, Black Swan Capital






Long bond comments

News & Comment
9 Sep 2016/7:29 a.m. 

If you have been following our Key Market Strategies issues, we have been expecting a sell-off in US long bonds (higher yields) based on the developed wave setup---a triangle pattern (which is a continuation pattern)--as you can see in the chart below using the exchange traded fund (TLT - 20-yr bond index) as the measure :

30-yr Treasury Bond Futures off 24/32nds today (almost a full point)....2-yr Notes flat....

The implication is the dollar regains yield cover; and it may increase sentiment/expectations for a future Fed hike.  This in turn should be dollar bullish.  The additional takeaway is if, and a big if, this move in bonds roils the stock market (and I suspect it will) then the dollar gets a risk bid added to the yield cover.  This is a big part of why we remain dollar bullish despite the palpable change in sentiment from some quarters.   

If we do get a break in stocks, we would suspect the usual:

- USD/JPY to remain supported and maybe EUR/USD too
- Comdols and the pound to get hit; comdols the most



Duration told us and Symmetry is telling us oil has bottomed

Please click here to view the PDF version


“Formula for success: rise early, work hard, strike oil.”

                                     J. Paul Getty

 Commentary & Analysis

Duration told us and Symmetry is telling us oil has bottomed

There are lots of decent rationales to suggest why oil prices have bottomed.  Rising prices for Permian Basin drilling properties would be one.  Inability of Iran to crank up production as fast as expected might be another.  China’s latest stimulus might fit.  But what got my attention a while back was the break of a major trend line coupled with our wave analysis.  What added confidence to a longer term bullish view was duration and now chart symmetry suggests more to go on the upside.

Duration is a simple concept (not the fixed income type).  And it’s easy to apply.  If you can count, you can follow duration.  No algorithm or fancy technical charting package needed.  I started following duration years ago after reading an excellent book by Woody Dorsey, titled, Behavioral Trading. Besides being an incredible analyst, Mr. Dorsey is a gifted writer; you have to love a book when the title of the first page of introduction is this: “The History of Markets Is the History of Human Error.”  Bingo!

“There are decisions in trend duration measurement that may seem equivocal….Mathematical models like econometrics are precise.  But precision, while always presuming to be righteous, is not necessarily always the most useful.  If we want to absorb the form or gestalt of the market, we may be willing to honor some abstraction over the ‘precise’ precision….Practical behavioral finance is not about mathematical models, which are the sole province of the purely rational.  It is about unleashing the intelligence of our other brains and dancing to the music of the durations.”

                                                                            Woody Dorsey

Simply put (and this will be clear in the chart oil prices below), in bear markets the duration of the moves lower in price will be consistently longer than the moves higher; thus, defining a bear market means the trend moves (lower) take more time than the corrections (higher). 

Now, in said bear market, what if we see a “correction” higher with duration much longer than normal (defined by the average length of recent corrections higher). Well, that should get our attention immediately; and especially if increase in duration occurs at a time when sentiment in extreme territory.  That is a flashing yellow light telling us that a trend may have changed—pay attention!

Below is a chart showing the duration periods for crude oil from late June 2015 through yesterday (Friday 26 August 2016). Editor’s Note: I shared this chart in a recent issue for Money Talks Michael Campbell’s Insider Edge in an article about finding the trend.  Mike is a friend; and one of the best global strategists you can find anywhere.  His Saturday Money Talks weekly radio show is brilliant.]

Crude Oil Futures Daily:

Key points from the chart above:

  1. After the trend low in oil prices was made in early February 2016, the duration of the move higher was 27 days; dwarfing the duration of four previous rallies of five, two, eight, and six days, respectively.  That alone was an indication maybe the trend had change. 
  2. In the midst of that 27-day move higher there was a break above the long-term downtrend line going back to June 2015.
  3. There was divergence in momentum and the low in price was made on February 11th 2016.
  4. And you can bet the sentiment was pretty bleak for oil in early February 2016. 

So in effect, the duration added confidence to our other indications the trend in oil prices had changed.  The intermediate term trend was higher.

Now, as you view the chart above, notice the symmetry.  The red dotted line dissects the chart into halves (the fulcrum).  Notice how the left side looks like a mirror image of the right side.  This confirms two important aspects of markets: 1) trend duration seems to be similar in bull or bear markets; and 2) price movement in markets is fractal. 

So there you have it.  Trend duration and symmetry to help us spot trend changes; thank you Mr. Dorsey.  A powerful set of indicators we can all do at home boys and girls, all you need do is have access to a price chart and count.  Once again, it appears letting Mr. Market talk to us in his own language beats hanging our hats on the gossip of the pundits any day. 

Sign Up for Black Swan Forex Free Week

If you would like to sample the Black Swan Forex service, simply send us your name and email address and we will set up with full access to our service.

Here is what you can expect from the Black Swan Forex service:

1.       Morning Report

a.      Update on current open positions

b.      Market comments – general market comments & key news

c.       Levels – Support/Resistance, Swing, & Pivot levels for each major pair both hourly and daily basis

d.      Comments on each of the major pairs

e.      Chart View of each of the major pairs

2.      Updated details Elliott Wave analysis – emailed and posted to our site archives

3.      Occasional audio/video updates on the technical setup of the major pairs (also posted to site archives)

4.      Suggested trading ideas laying out all necessary levels – entry/risk/two profit targets

a.      Sent in a timely manner through email, Skype, and text to mobile phone

b.      Continuous follow up through the life of the trade idea – risk adjustments, updated profit levels, and specific commentary

5.      Access to me via email, Skype, or telephone (after noon ET for phone calls please).  I cannot give specific trading advice, but I am happy to clarify and discuss any thoughts and ideas I have shared in the service.

Our analysis is completely independent.  We have no ax to grind or story to prove.  We take what the market gives us.  Our trades are driven by the Elliott Wave pattern setups keyed off the hourly charts. Holding period is normally about two to four days. 

This is an active trading service which can benefit both the sophisticated individual trader and institutions seeking specific actionable ideas and ongoing research.  But even if you don’t consider yourself “sophisticated” and want to take advantage of the profit potential, you may be able to do so through our Trade Copier Program; you can click here to find out if you are eligible.

You can find our track record posted here at our site.

And in case you don’t know this – I eat my own cooking; i.e. I take the same trades in my sport forex account as I suggest to you. [Note: We do not trade currency options for our own account at Black Swan Capital due to the potential for front-running as options markets can be quite thin.]

Thank you.

Jack Crooks

President, Black Swan Capital