Daily Market Commentary and Analysis

Currency Currents, our free daily blog, sent directly to your email box.

Your email:

Follow Us ...

Listen To This Blog

Our flagship newsletter, as a reader and subscriber to our BlackSwan blog you stay tuned-in to our current global-macro view and our analysis of key investment themes driving currency and commodity prices.

Nothing is off limits to us in this freewheeling look at the markets. But ultimately we have one goal in mind: to help you get a handle on the key investment themes driving global capital flow. Because if you know where the money is going, it increases the probability that your position in the market will be a profitable one.

The price tag may say 'FREE' ... but it's worth a heck of a lot.

Posts by category

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Two words for delusional China bulls: 'PER CAPITA.'

  
  
  

DANGER red dragon china 300wWhen I hear someone mention China in the midst of a political discussion aimed at understanding our future economic path, I shake my head.

There are very real reasons to give China's economy lots of press. What they have accomplished over the last 30 years -- major reform and a relatively more open economy -- is worthy of recognition. Even the fact that they've been able to maintain a decently high pace of growth through one of the toughest economic times the world can remember deserves some accolades.

But when we start talking about how China is going to overtake the United States, that's when the ignorance rages uncontrollably. 

China will not surpass the United States. Not anytime soon.

On any measure that determines global dominance, China pales in comparison to the US. Most people only concern themselves with China's GDP growth rates; but would it not make more sense to consider the total size, based on 2010 estimates, of China's economy ($10.09 trillion) relative to the US economy ($14.66 trillion)?

If that's not enough, let's look at those two very important words: PER CAPITA.

Overall size of an economy is not a perfect indicator of power. So even if China's economy closes the gap, more important is per capita GDP. The United Kingdom ruled the world for quite some time, not because it had the largest economy but because it had the wealthiest economy in the world.

Over the last 30 years, while China was undergoing an economic transformation, the wealth gap between the US and China, based on per capita income, widened ... by a lot. The chart below shows this; it is from the IMF's website:

012612 us china gdp per capita 

Since the early 1980s, the PPP per capita GDP gap has grown by $27,000.

So, yes China is making strides forward on many fronts. But it is not catching up to the US on real measures of global importance. And more immediately, China runs the risk of now losing ground ... because they are having trouble managing their economy through a global economic transition period. It has gotten ugly and is bound to get uglier.

We recently explained why it makes sense to be ready for a major China disappointment. You can read it here ...

Comments

Per capita income, per se, as a gross economic factor, may mask important on-the-ground factors that influence the quality of daily life: access to cheap local food, access to low-cost medical care, low cost of public education that enables, perhaps, future economic opportunity.  
 
Having a higher per-capita income that is "eaten up" by high taxation, high medical care costs for both basic and advanced services, high fees for quality education, and high costs for the basics of living: shelter, food, etc., raises the question of what is true "personal income." 
 
So, a hundred million or so Americans can buy the latest iWhatever: but all the factories, and all the jobs, and all the manufacturers of all the components for the iWhatever are located in ... China. 
 
And China "sits on" a hoard of great national surplus wealth created by export vs. import trade earnings: how that wealth will be "spent:" that, for this writer, is ... the question.
Posted @ Friday, January 27, 2012 8:13 AM by willywoo
It is the low per capita numbers that makes China powerful! That means the govt is still in the driving seat, and it can still leverage the low human capital cost. 
 
If China has higher per capita numbers and become more democratic, China will slow down.
Posted @ Friday, January 27, 2012 8:23 AM by leon
I wonder what the graphs would like when adjusted for inflation. Much of what passes for an increase in "wealth" in the US is just a product of the animal spirits that reside at the Fed and those nearest to the feeding trough.
Posted @ Friday, January 27, 2012 2:14 PM by Collon Shandler
I feel that your comment has attracted opinions that show discontent in the US and this is the main point. I live in Hong Kong, close to China and feel as does Michael Pettis, that the figures of the growth are good, but not as good as they say and that a huge fall will come later this year in China due to the production of many non producing infrastructure projects and "towns with no people" throughout China. The third financial quarter will show the reality I am afraid.
Posted @ Friday, January 27, 2012 7:39 PM by Anthony Fussell
In the US 
 
 
 
1% of the population own 38.3% Wealth 
 
 
 
20% of the population own 85% Wealth. 
 
 
 
That I suggest would be China under 
 
the Mongul Emperors.
Posted @ Saturday, January 28, 2012 12:46 AM by Paul Malley
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics